刘瑞瑞,卢璐,李笑石,耿纪刚,张崴琪,马永利.模拟检查及心理干预呼吸训练对冠状动脉CTA的影响分析[J].上海护理,2023,23(4):
模拟检查及心理干预呼吸训练对冠状动脉CTA的影响分析
Analysis of the effect of training breathing combined with different degrees of psychological intervention on the effect of coronary CTA examination
DOI:
中文关键词:  冠脉CTA  呼吸训练  呼吸频率  心率  卫生教育  图像质量
英文关键词:CCTA  Respiratory training  Respiratory rate  Heart rate  Health education  Image quality  
基金项目:中国红十字基金会“影瑞西北公益行”之ICON 科研(编号::XM_HR_ICON_2020_1)
作者单位E-mail
刘瑞瑞 西安大兴医院 1163759950@qq.com 
卢璐 西安大兴医院  
李笑石 西安大兴医院  
耿纪刚 西安大兴医院  
张崴琪 空军军医大学西京医院  
马永利* 西安大兴医院 1271078180@qq.com 
摘要点击次数: 927
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 对比分析结合不同程度心理干预下的训练呼吸,对患者行冠状动脉CTA检查效果的影响。方法 选取我院心脏内科住院需行冠脉CTA检查的患者共270例,随机分为A组、B组和C组,每组90例。A组采用提前一天有家属陪同、有模拟场景心理疏导后进行呼吸训练,第二天再行冠脉CTA检查。B组采用没有家属陪同、有模拟场景心理疏导训练呼吸,当天行CTA检查;C组采用常规呼吸训练,即没有家属陪同及模拟场景训练呼吸,仅做常规检查前呼吸训练及心理疏导后立即进行CTA检查。统计并比较三组患者呼吸配合达标率、心率稳定度、冠状动脉图像质量、焦虑自评量表(SAS)。结果 A组呼吸配合达标率、心率稳定度均大于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组图像质量优于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组患者的SAS评分在呼吸训练前差异无统计学意义,训练后的SAS量表评分中,A组评分显著高于B、C两组(P<0.05)。结论 检查前一天家属陪同训练呼吸及心理疏导能提高患者的信任度、安全感,第二天检查时患者心理建设完备,焦虑情绪减低,稳定患者呼吸频率、心率,进而提高图像质量,值得临床广泛推广使用。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare and analyze the effect of training breathing combined with different degrees of psychological intervention on the effect of coronary CTA examination in patients. Methods A total of 270 patients in the Cardiology Department of our hospital who needed coronary CTA were selected and randomly divided into group A, group B and group C, 90 cases in each group. Group A was accompanied by family members one day in advance, followed by psychological counseling in a simulated scenario, and then underwent coronary CTA examination the next day. Group B used breathing training without family members and with simulated scenarios, and underwent CTA examination on the same day; group C adopted routine breathing training, that is, without family members and simulated scenarios to train breathing, and only performed breathing training before routine examination and psychological counseling immediately after CTA check. The respiratory coordination compliance rate, heart rate stability, coronary image quality, and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) of the three groups were counted and compared.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器 全文HTML
关闭